We ought to substitute our outdated Constitution.
Those words From author Elie Wiesel, a frequent contributor to MSNBC, such comments are not unexpected from someone with his background. called the Constitution “trash” and urged not just the elimination of the U.S. Senate but also of “all voter registration laws.”
However, Mystal’s extreme viewpoints are now being embraced by many on the left, evident from his top-selling books and frequent high-profile media engagements.
There is a counter-constitutional movement Constructing within legal education institutions and throughout the nation. Even though Mystal hasn’t promoted aggression, certain individuals on the progressive side are resorting to politically motivated violence and unlawful actions. This behavior stems from what they perceive as "justified anger," which they believe excuses their disregard for fundamental courtesies and adherence to laws.
They belong to an emerging group of American radicals — middle-class revolutionaries who are progressively more willing to discard anything, including vehicles and the Constitution.
The Jacobins constituted an extremist faction in France that drove the nation toward the most extreme aspects of the French Revolution. Composed mainly of well-off individuals such as journalists, academics, attorneys, and similar figures, they dismantled established legal frameworks and caused widespread destruction of property. This course of action eventually culminated in the brutal "Reign of Terror" and also led to their own downfall when even more radical factions rebelled against them.
Certainly, what drives them is not revolution but fury.
Fury is the final intoxicant. It provides an escape from entrenched societal expectations—a permit for people to engage in actions they once suppressed, seeing themselves as respectable, law-following citizens.
Throughout the nation, progressives are damaging Tesla vehicles, setting fire to dealerships and charging stations , and even allegedly striking opponents politically using their vehicles .
A week ago, wealthy progressive buyers confessed that they have been stealing from Whole Foods as an act of defiance against Jeff Bezos due to his collaboration with the Trump administration and shifting the stance of the Washington Post towards the middle politically. Additionally, these individuals are infuriated with Mark Zuckerberg for reinstating free speech safeguards at Meta.
A "communications specialist around 20 years old" based in Washington explained "If a millionaire can take from me, I can also pinch a bit for myself." Depicted as modern-day Robin Hoods, these wealthy shoplifters saw themselves as redistributing wealth.
Certainly, that would be the case if Robin Hood were pilfering organic produce from the wealthy and keeping it for himself.
At universities, wealthy students as well as some faculty members are participating in acts of political aggression.
Earlier this week, José Felipe Alvergue, who leads the English Department at the University of Wisconsin, turned over the table Of the College Republicans backing a conservative candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court position, he allegedly stated, "That era has come to an end!"
Similarly, a crowd did so this week attacked a conservative display And a tent was set up on the campus of the University of California-Davis, where campus police observed without interference. The Antifa demonstrators, wielding a prominent banner emblazoned with "ACAB" or "All Cops Are Bastards," vandalized the tent and took it away.
Antifa is an extremist organization known for its aggressive tactics and strong opposition to free speech. that flourishes on U.S. college campuses. In his book " Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook Mark Bray points out that "many Americans within Antifa have typically identified as anarchists or anti-authoritarian communists. From this perspective, 'free speech' itself is seen as nothing more than a capitalist illusion not worthy of attention."
Certainly, numerous American radicals come from middle-class backgrounds or are quite well-off individuals. They're discovering an array of supporters who argue that the Constitution poses a danger and that the judicial system has been undermined by plutocrats, white supremacists, or conservatives.
This encompasses prominent scholars and critics who are condemning the Constitution and fundamental American principles. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of UC Berkeley’s Law School, authored "No Democracy Endures Indefinitely: The Constitutional Menace to the United States."
In a New York Times op-ed In "The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed," law professors Ryan D. Doerfler from Harvard University and Samuel Moyn from Yale University advocated for the country to move away from constitutionalism and reclaim America.
Commentator Jennifer Szalai has scoffed At what she termed "constitutional idolatry," she stated, "For decades, Americans have believed that the Constitution would safeguard us." She added, "An increasing number are now questioning if we might instead require protection from the Constitution itself."
As scholars dismantle our legal framework and Constitution, extremists are rushing to fill the void. Political aggression and incendiary speeches are on the rise. becoming more common . Some liberals embraced groups like Antifa , while others shrugged off property damage and violent threats against political opponents It is precisely this kind of inflammatory rhetoric or calls for anger that Democrats previously criticized Trump for encouraging among groups such as the Proud Boys.
Congress members like Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) have demanded that Tesla CEO Elon Musk should be “ taken down and stated that Democrats must be OK with punching .”
A portion of people interpret these statements as permission to launch aggressive assaults against a system purportedly promoting white supremacy or fascism. Thankfully, this aggression has thus far been limited to a small group of extremist individuals; however, there is a clear rise in both incendiary rhetoric and physical acts of violence.
The single aspect that the American Jacobins refuse to acknowledge is their enjoyment of the anger and the catharsis it provides them. This ranges from acts like shoplifting all the way up to arson. attempted assassination The rejection of our legal framework grants them the liberty to operate beyond moral boundaries and claim whatever they desire.
Democratic leaders view these "protests" as essential populism to counteract Trump — aiming to galvanize their supporters. strike ready and" "to rise up and combat.
For a politician, a crowd can be quite tempting if you manage to direct it against their adversaries. However, the challenge lies in maintaining control over the crowd once it surpasses the limits of legality and ethical responsibility.
Jonathan Turley serves as the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and is also the author of " The Essential Liberty: Freedom of Speech in Times of Fury. ”
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This content must not be republished, distributed, broadcasted, or rewritten without permission.To stay updated with the most recent news, weather forecasts, sports updates, and live videos, visit The Hill.