Creating art for another person entails conversations and negotiations.

This person was taken aback that their friend had painted a mirror for them since they hadn't talked about it beforehand.

Therefore, they declined to cover the cost.

Please read the complete narrative provided underneath.

Am I wrong for not wanting to pay for a commission that was created for me?

I was enjoying some beverages with a family friend named Robert.

Robert commissioned an artist to paint his family crest onto a mirror.

It was carried out by a shared acquaintance of the family, named Kay.

It seemed she created it for him at no cost, but she intended to turn it into a business venture.

This individual explained the art piece to Robert.

Robert began discussing with me whether I'd be interested in having a comparable "masterpiece" created.

In the end, I recounted one that consisted of Leopard, Baiser, and Alice.

They stood beside a stream along with the giant guns, the flower monster, and the cat behind them. Their alternate selves were mirrored in the water.

They noticed Robert’s painted mirror but weren't particularly impressed.

The next time I visited Robert, I didn’t have anything to drink with me this time around.

I spotted his decorated mirror once more, which he took great pride in.

I considered it quite novice work and didn’t think about it further.

Kay, the artist, created the artwork as described.

A few weeks afterward, Kay and Robert are at someone's doorstep, knocking.

Kay has had the mirror painted for me.

She said to me, "That will cost you £400."

I said to her, "No, thank you."

They declined to accept it.

She argued that it was done now and that she had taken time and materials to make it.

I reiterated that I was not interested.

She began talking about how I shouldn't have ordered it because I had no intention of purchasing it.

It was never brought up before.

I mentioned that she hadn't told me anything about it prior to creating it.

She ought to have coordinated with me. She shouldn't have simply relied on a secondhand account from Robert.

We might have settled for a much cheaper price well below her desired $500 rate right from the start.

Perhaps she ought to have requested a deposit prior to beginning.

They said it's too expensive considering the quality.

She tried to argue.

However, I concluded by stating that £400 was too expensive for a painted mirror.

It might be better than what I'm capable of since my artistic skills aren't great, but a typical average art student could likely produce something superior.

Their relationships have been damaged due to this.

She became quite furious over this, just like Robert.

However, I declined to purchase.

Since they are acquaintances of the family, they voiced their complaints to my parents regarding this matter.

My parents concur that I shouldn’t purchase it, yet this creates some friction within their relationships with Kay and Robert.

AITA?

She did not hire the artist for the work. Briefly bringing up the topic to a acquaintance who isn't the creator and hasn't talked about compensation doesn't count as hiring an artist!

Let's check out how other users have responded to this tale on Reddit.

A person engaged in commissioned tasks expresses their opinions.

She blames herself for being foolish, according to this individual.

This individual offers their genuine viewpoint.

An artist likewise voices their opinions.

And lastly, brief and straightforward.

It wasn’t a commission; it was a shakedown!

If you found that tale intriguing, take a look at this one about A person developed a point system for their estate distribution, resulting in an unexpected outcome where a close acquaintance receives the majority of the inheritance.

Sign Up To get the latest internet culture news updates through the weekly Twisted Sifter’s newsletter.

The post A friend created commissioned art for them without prior discussion, so this person decided not to pay for it. first on .