President Donald Trump’s extensive new policy of imposing tariffs on imports from virtually every country worldwide aims to boost American manufacturing. However, he will quickly realize that this approach will actually achieve the contrary result. warned the Conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board on Thursday — the most recent in a series of events long line of criticisms The board has commented on Trump's trade strategy.
The push to "disrupt the global trade framework," occurring alongside Trump’s efforts to dismantle significant portions of the federal administration, includes institutions that boost manufacturing The board contended that this would result in multiple outcomes, all of which were unfavorable.
The initial consequence mentioned is the possible rapid harm to the American economy, noted the board.
Looking for additional up-to-date political news? Tap here for the newest stories from Raw Story.
The total effect of Mr. Trump’s series of tariff hikes on the economy remains uncertain — primarily because it's unclear how nations will respond. Should countries attempt negotiations with the U.S. to decrease these tariffs, the negative consequences might be less severe. However, if they choose to retaliate broadly, this could lead to reduced global trade volumes and diminished economic growth, potentially resulting in a downturn or even more serious outcomes.
The taxes will be borne by U.S. workers and will slowly diminish our competitive edge, the board cautioned.
ALSO READ: 'Surprised by the turn of events': Senators express concern over one element of the government funding bill
However, it extends beyond that point; the board contended that the tariffs will ultimately hinder some of President Trump’s key policy objectives.
Firstly, his aim is to increase American exports; however, these exports are expected to decline.
American exports will be hit directly by reciprocal tariffs. Additionally, they will face indirect consequences as other nations enter into trade agreements that favor businesses outside the U.S. Consider Brazil’s surge in soybean sales following President Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods during his initial term.
At the same time, the board cautioned that U.S. economic dominance globally will crumble.
In the most adverse scenario, the global trade framework might revert to mutually harmful protectionist measures akin to those seen during the 1930s.
China, which has been hit hardest by the tariffs, could potentially increase its influence, according to the board.
In his initial term, Mr. Trump withdrew from the Asia-Pacific trade agreement that didn’t include China. Since then, Beijing has signed its own pact with several of those nations.
China has already established significant connections with typically rival nations like Japan and South Korea, and might also secure agreements with European countries.
The board noted that a less apparent impact might be increased corruption in Washington.
Mr. Trump asserts that there will be no exceptions to the tariffs. However, anticipate that this pledge might evaporate when politicians, including Mr. Trump himself, view these exemptions as an opportunity to secure campaign funds from businesses. For those in the political sphere, Liberation Day has become another day for luxury purchases.
"The following isn’t an exhaustive compilation, yet we present these ideas as points of contemplation as Mr. Trump constructs his new protectionist landscape,” the board determined. “Reconfiguring the global economic system carries significant implications, which might not collectively amount to the ‘new golden era’ that Mr. Trump claims.”
Recommended Links:
- Trump backed down before his tariffs could inflict significant harm, according to the WSJ editorial board.
- 'Consequences': WSJ Op-Ed Criticizes Trump for 'Breaking Trust' and 'Targeting Allies'
- "Gulp": WSJ Editorial Board "perplexed" as Trump action poised to "hit" his own MAGA supporters
- Heist": WSJ op-ed criticizes Trump’s "obsession with tariffs