The White House has claimed that the investigation into national security officials' use of Signal is concluded, but this statement is facing opposition in Congress, including from some Republicans who maintain that they will continue with their investigations.
On Monday, the White House stated that they have implemented measures to prevent a recurrence of the accidental inclusion of a journalist in a group chat meant for discussing confidential details regarding an upcoming airstrike in Yemen.
However, Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), who serves on the Senate’s Armed Services Committee, pointed out that legislators' intentions to investigate the issue further have not concluded. asking for an investigation as reported by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.
I find this message quite encouraging," he stated when questioned by The Hill regarding the White House's remarks. "Although it might be true, we will have to wait and see what the Department of Defense's inspector general has to say.
It has already started. We have already made the request - the committee did so with support from both parties - and we will review it together across party lines.
Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.), part of the Senate Intelligence Committee, addressed national security officials at the recent yearly worldwide threats briefing, expressing his intention to ask further questions about the topic.
“Not all concerns have been resolved yet. Therefore, we will continue to gain further insights moving ahead,” he stated to The Hill.
Certainly, numerous Republicans showed little interest in tackling this subject. Despite Directors of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe testifying before Congress over the subsequent two days following the revelation, many chose not to address the matter when questioned.
However, collaborative initiatives between parties to examine the issue in the Senate will keep progressing, whereas House Democrats have also advocated for an external assessment throughout various governmental bodies.
The actions taken by the White House remain unclear as they attempt to navigate through this controversy.
"As far as we're concerned, this case has been concluded here at the White House," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated to reporters on Monday.
"There have been measures implemented to make certain that such an incident cannot occur again in the future. The president, along with Mike Waltz and his complete national security team, has been collaborating effectively. If one examines the enhanced safety of the United States under this administration's guidance, their teamwork becomes evident," Leavitt stated, referring to President Trump’s national security advisor.
When questioned by journalists on Thursday regarding whether Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth would be investigated, Trump dismissed the matter as well.
Don't mention that again. ... It's such an overused tale.
Administrative personnel have likewise shown irritation as they believe insufficient attention has been directed towards highlighting the achievements of the mission, particularly its impact on Houthi positions.
The repercussions from the conversation persist, with further reports emerging regarding the utilization of Signal.
This week, The Wall Street Journal reported that Waltz had initiated this action. other Signal groups To talk about issues related to national safety, with an emphasis on how an allied nation like Israel fits into this discussion. was annoyed To witness the intelligence provided for the operation in Yemen being made public.
Politico reported On Wednesday, Waltz’s group has established at least 20 distinct Signal chat channels for coordinating various issues.
Intelligence analysts contend that even with encryption, Signal should not be used as a medium for handling classified or sensitive data. They point out that intelligence organizations have warned their staff about using Signal, highlighting that it is under surveillance by hostile foreign entities.
Legal experts have said The accidental disclosure of national defense data, as reported by The Atlantic, could potentially breach the Espionage Act if shared within such a group. Additionally, the feature allowing messages to disappear would likely conflict with public record-keeping regulations.
The Washington Post Also reported on Monday was that Waltz and his team utilized a less secure platform—Gmail—for official governmental tasks. However, an NSC representative stated that the advisor consistently copied his professional email address whenever he communicated through "legacy contacts" as per record-keeping regulations, and affirmed that he neither did nor would ever transmit sensitive or classified data via an unsecured account.
Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.), who leads the Senate Intelligence Committee as the senior Democrat, wrote an opinion piece in the Journal stating that the situation with Signal "remains very much open."
"It suggests we will remain unaware of just how many additional mistakes occurred. We cannot be certain whether the phones have undergone checks for malicious software. Additionally, we are left uncertain about the number of other discussions that might have taken place. Honestly, if my fellow Republicans aren't speaking up about this, it does not look good for our nation’s safety," he stated to The Hill.
Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who likewise serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee, voiced comparable worries.
"The case remains open as we are unaware of all the ongoing chat conversations and potential illegal email exchanges. No one has faced consequences yet. While they want to conclude the investigation, the issue continues unresolved, which leaves us more vulnerable," he stated.
Senator James Lankford from Oklahoma stated that he had no knowledge of the White House’s internal review procedures and chose not to offer an opinion on their adequacy.
"I'm not aware of the internal changes made regarding their processing methods. The main concern I have is finding an effective way for members of the executive branch to share crucial information when they're traveling. This capability must definitely be present. Therefore, what format should be used to facilitate such communication? There needs to be a reliable method for them to stay connected," he stated.
In addition to requesting an inquiry from the Department of Defense’s Inspector General, Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee have urged Gabbard to initiate a damage assessment of the incident—a standard procedure following breaches of classified information.
And Democrats from the House Oversight Committee asked for an investigation From the inspectors general of the Departments of Defense, State, and Treasury, along with the CIA, and also including White House counsel David Warrington.
"It is essential for your offices to examine this issue as well as any additional instances where high-ranking officials from the Trump Administration may have inadvertently exposed critically sensitive or classified national security data due to ineptitude or oversight," Representative Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who leads the committee, stated in his correspondence with them.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This content must not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or distributed without permission.To stay updated with the most recent news, weather forecasts, sporting events, and live streams, visit CBS 42.